Two days after commemorating the second anniversary of former premier Rafiq Hariri's killing, "Essayed" (the Mister) Hassan Nassrallah has given a speech that I qualify as very bad and escalating the tensions in Lebanon.
The Mister has qualified the truck which the Lebanese authorities detain after it appeared that it contains weapons destinated to the Lebanese resistence, but which was illegally entered to Lebanon via Syria, the Mister said that that weapons "are raped" by the authorities and that he will not "forgive to the responsibles their acts".
After almost three months of opened demonstrations downtown Lebanon, the opposition's way of negotiation by putting in fire wheels and making obstacles in front of any political or amicable solution to the current tension, is failed until now to force the Lebanese government to resign.
I would like to refresh the memory of the Mister that he involved Lebanon in a non-reasonable war against Israel in the 2006's summer. I like to refresh his memory too and tell him that the resistence is not linked to one category of people or sects, all Lebanon is resisting, all Lebanon is defending Lebanon.
If at least we know from where the government is getting money (from countries, international financial institutions and organisation through the Lebanese Central bank: Banque De Liban) could the Mister justify to us from Hezbollah is getting more than 500 millions of US Dollars per year? If hezbollah and its Mister are contesting that the 14th March movement are using their mony to buy people and voters, how can hezbollah, the party of God although I am supecious that God would accept to have a party on earth, how can the hezb justify its donations to peole southern Beirut and southern Lebanon? I like to refresh the hezb's meomry that some district in Beirut and in the south are prohibited on the national security and guards to enter. Is that fair to let a group of people armed with thousands of missiles and rocks taking control of a parcel of land of a sovereign country? If that's not to protect the interests of Iran and Syria in Lebanon towards USA and the West, how could they justify it? Lebanon is a card in the hands of Syria, Iran, USA and its allies, but if I have to choose I will say as PM Siniora says: I would like to establish normal relationships based on respect and confidence with our brothers in Syria & Iran, and at the same time I would like to hold good relationships with our friends in the West".
Let us give a chance to the current government..we cannot after a year and half say that the governent is bad. How can we judge it after such short period of time? I cannot understand that. If some people and groups like the Mister Nassrallah, Hezbollah and Aoun are making obstacle in front of the government and are carrying the whole country to a disaster, how do they want to judge the government's performance? Let it correctly working and as in the democratic countries, if after its 5 year term of governing you judge that it was a bad ruler, let the Lebanese citizens allowed to vote, to vote and to choose another majority and another government. This is how democratic nations work! not with putting in fire wheels, screeming in the streets, making coalition with foreigners, entering a country in a war without being judged for that...Mister Hassan Nassrallah..it is shame on you what you are making to Lebanon and the Lebanese..Mister Hassan Nassrallah..please accept this from me: Go to the hell & fuck you!
